Kinesis Money
The Digital Evolution Of The Gold Standard
Kinesis Money is a monetary platform built around physical gold and silver that enables individuals and businesses to buy, hold, transfer, spend, and receive precious metals through a digital payment system.
Instead of relying on fiat currencies, the platform uses two native tokens: KAU, which represents one gram of gold, and KAG, which represents one ounce of silver. According to Kinesis’ legal documentation, each token represents direct ownership of fully allocated physical metal held in insured, independently operated vaults across a number of major precious-metals trading hubs. The one-to-one backing of KAU and KAG is independently audited twice a year by Bureau Veritas, a global inspection, testing, and certification company.
In 1830, the British economist Nassau William Senior observed that “the portableness of the precious metals and the universality of the demand for them render the whole commercial world one country, in which bullion is the money.” While gold-backed tokens such as Pax Gold and Tether Gold are primarily intended as investment products, Kinesis’ KAU and KAG are built to work as digital currencies inside a broader monetary system—essentially reviving a role precious metals have played for centuries.
Why People Are Looking Beyond Fiat Currencies: The Quest for Sound Money
In his 1966 essay Gold and Economic Freedom, long before becoming the 13th Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan offered a striking explanation for the hostility toward the gold standard: “In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. … The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.”
We can debate the real intentions of those whom Greenspan called welfare statists, while critics of the gold standard argue that modern economies require monetary flexibility and that strict asset backing can constrain policymakers during crises. What is hardly deniable, however, is the vulnerability of fiat currencies to devaluation—particularly when authorities resort to stimulus measures.
It is understandable, then, that many have begun looking for alternatives: a medium of exchange that resists debasement through arbitrary creation. This was what originally made Bitcoin attractive, before it became a purely speculative asset.
Unfortunately, while fiat currencies steadily lost purchasing power, gold was portrayed as a relic—a pet rock. Investment advisors largely shared Warren Buffett’s dismissive view that gold was just an unproductive asset sitting idle in a vault: “[Gold] gets dug out of the ground in Africa, or someplace. Then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again, and pay people to stand around guarding it. It has no utility.”
Yet the shift went beyond how gold was viewed as an investment: its role as money was pushed into the background, both in the modern monetary system and in much of the financial commentary surrounding it, so much so that gold’s monetary irrelevance within a modern economy became a widely shared assumption. One can see this, for example, in something as ordinary as online investing forums, where gold is almost always discussed in the commodities section rather than the currency section, as though its monetary history were little more than a historical footnote. And who doesn’t remember Ben Bernanke’s answer during the 2011 House Financial Services Committee hearing, when Rep. Ron Paul asked why central banks still held gold if it was not money? Bernanke replied with a single word: tradition.
I believe—maybe due to some sort of Cantillon effect, whereby new money benefits those closest to its creation before prices rise for everyone else—that the decoupling of money from gold has benefited the financial establishment far more than the ordinary citizen. I believe also that continuous money creation and the resulting currency devaluation give sophisticated investors substantial advantages, like privileged access to superior information and complex products largely unknown or inaccessible to most. According to an FDIC survey, 18% of U.S. households are unbanked or underbanked, while low-income households living paycheck to paycheck typically lack both the resources and the buffer needed to invest effectively.
Democratizing Access to precious metals
In some countries, a mature retail bullion market exists and feels perfectly normal. In many others, however, it is virtually absent, leaving ordinary individuals with few realistic options.
Even where dealers are available, the process is far more complicated than opening a savings account or buying an ETF. Investors face decisions about coins versus bars, small denominations or larger ones, insurance, secure transportation, verifying authenticity, competitive spreads—and perhaps the most pressing: where to store the bullion safely.
The well-known If you don’t hold it, you don’t own it principle, which some stackers treat as an unquestionable rule, often reflects the perspective of investors in stable, affluent countries where secure home storage is realistic. It overlooks the circumstances of millions elsewhere, for whom security concerns, inadequate housing, political instability, or weak legal protections make home storage neither practical nor desirable. It also sits uneasily with institutional ownership: a pension fund may hold allocated bullion, but no one expects it to store the metal itself.
Platforms like Kinesis remove many of these hurdles. One can own allocated gold and silver through a smartphone and internet connection. On the exchange, people trade against major currencies and crypto at prices close to wholesale, keeping spreads tight. Unlike traditional physical gold, where capital often remains locked up until sale, users can put their assets to work without surrendering the benefits of holding the metals. The divisibility of KAU and KAG allows purchases down to 0.00001 grams of gold or 0.00001 ounces of silver, opening the door even to those with very limited capital.
To me, this approach mirrors how mobile banking opened finance in emerging markets. Just as M-Pesa let millions in East Africa store and send money via basic phones without visiting a bank, Kinesis makes it possible to hold and use physical precious metals without dealing with vaults or dealers. That kind of access to sound money could prove just as significant.
Gold Standard 2.0: Sound Money for the Digital Age
Kinesis goes further than simply making bullion easier to own. Users can transfer value instantly between wallets. The Kinesis Card works like a regular payment card, converting gold and silver holdings into local currency in real time at checkout. Merchants can accept payments in precious metals through Kinesis Pay. In each case, the aim is to restore gold and silver to their traditional role as actual money, not merely investment assets.
History shows that new payment methods often meet skepticism at first. When credit cards arrived, plenty doubted anyone would trust plastic over cash. Similar doubts greeted online banking—many insisted they would never handle money over the internet and preferred walking into a branch. Today both feel ordinary.
In that sense, Kinesis can be thought of as Gold Standard 2.0. It is not a return to the 1800s, but a pairing of gold’s traditional discipline with the speed and convenience of digital tools. Recent laws in states such as Texas, Utah, and Florida have begun laying the groundwork for electronic gold and silver payment systems, showing the idea is gaining real traction.
An important distinction separates Gold Standard 2.0 from the first one: participation is voluntary. People choose whether to hold and transact in precious metals rather than having a single monetary system imposed on them. It aligns with one of Hayek’s fundamental convictions in Towards a Free Market Monetary System: “I am more convinced than ever that if we ever again are going to have a decent money, it will not come from government: it will be issued by private enterprise, because providing the public with good money which it can trust and use can not only be an extremely profitable business; it imposes on the issuer a discipline to which the government has never been and cannot be subject.”
To me, this voluntary aspect and the resulting currency competition are among the strongest features of the model. They give people and businesses what we might call free monetary choice.
Why the Allocated Bullion Exchange Matters
Kinesis builds on the Allocated Bullion Exchange, or ABX—an institutional platform for physical precious metals trading and storage that started in 2011 and fully launched in 2016.
For everyday users, what matters most is ABX’s established network of professional vaults and logistics partners like Malca-Amit, Armaguard, and Loomis International. These relationships provide access to insured, globally distributed storage infrastructure. The system handles ownership records, reconciliations, and independent audits. That’s why audits of the metal backing KAU and KAG, carried out by Bureau Veritas, can be done regularly and efficiently—everything sits within an established professional custody setup.
Can Gold and Silver Become Money Again in a Digital Economy?
When one considers the early history of the United States, it is striking how deeply some of the most influential Founding Fathers distrusted unbacked paper currency. Thomas Jefferson warned that “Paper is poverty, it is only the ghost of money.” George Washington spoke of states “falling into very foolish and wicked plans of emitting paper money.” James Madison called it unjust and unconstitutional, noting that it “affects the rights of property as much as taking away equal value in land.”
There is an obvious historical irony here: the very men who warned against paper currency now adorn the paper money whose expansion they would have decried.
Critics of restoring gold’s monetary role maintain that gold-backed payment systems cannot compete with established fiat networks. National currencies are deeply embedded in legal systems, taxation, employment, commerce, and everyday life, while the US dollar continues to dominate cross-border transactions.
Within the precious metals community, there is broad agreement in favour of returning to some version of a gold standard—anchoring money once again to gold rather than relying on fiat. Yet this preference is often accompanied by a deep-seated distrust of anything digital, shaped in large part by the Bitcoin phenomenon. One frequently encounters a nostalgic vision that seeks to revive payment systems from a century ago and apply them directly to today’s far more complex economy.
Within cryptocurrency circles, many view the physical nature of gold itself as a flaw—one that dooms any real chance of it regaining a monetary role in the digital age.
So the central question remains: can gold and silver function as money again in economies built around digital payments?
* If you decide to open a Kinesis account, using my affiliate link won’t affect your experience or incur any additional cost; it simply helps support this website. Every page includes a comment section, so if you have a question or observation, you’re welcome to leave one on the most relevant page.